Font size: bigger | smaller

Medical Information and the ADA: Inquiries and Confidentiality

This guide is for information only and is not legal advice. Legal advice must be tailored to specific facts. This guide is based on general legal principles and does not address all possible claims, exceptions or conditions related to the subject matter discussed.

by Marilynn Mika Spencer

Under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), an employer or potential employer is limited in what questions it can ask related to disability. This includes limiting an employer's ability to conduct medial examinations. The ADA also requires an employer to protect the medical confidentiality of job applicants and employees.

There are different rules about medical inquiries for each of the three stages of employment: before a job offer is made; after an offer is made but before employment begins; and after employment begins.

I. Medical inquiries before a job offer is made

Employers are limited in the kinds of medical information they can request from job applicants. Employers may not require applicants to undergo a medical or psychological exam and may not ask questions about a person's disability before making a job offer. Employers may whether job applicants can perform essential duties of the job.

Employers may not ask if an applicant: has a physical, intellectual or psychological disability; ever filed for workers' compensation; takes medication; is receiving medical or psychiatric treatment; has ever received medical or psychiatric treatment; or has ever spent the night in the hospital.

Employers may ask questions that are directly related to the ability to do the job, such as whether the applicant can: lift a certain weight; type a certain speed; alphabetize information; put items in numerical order; etc.

If a job applicant volunteers information about an invisible disability or if a disability is obvious, such as the applicant uses a visible prosthetic limb, the employer may ask questions regarding the need for reasonable accommodation or what type of accommodation may be needed.

II. Medical inquiries after an offer is made but before employment begins

After an employer has offered a job to an applicant, the employer may then ask questions regarding the applicant's health, including questions regarding disability. The employer may require a medical examination. However, all applicants must be asked the same questions and must be required to take the same medical exam.

After an employer receives medical information from all applicants to whom it extended job offers, the employer may ask specific questions of specific individuals if the questions are medically related to previously-obtained medical information.

III. Medical inquiries after employment begins

Employers may ask a current employee questions regarding the employee's medical condition, or may require the employee to submit to a medical exam. However, to do so, the employer has to have reason to believe the employee’s medical condition may be a direct threat to the employee’s safety or to others, or must believe there is a medical basis for a change in the employee’s job performance. This belief must be based on objective evidence.

IV. Medical confidentiality

An employer must keep all medical information separate from general personnel files, and treat it as a separate, confidential medical record.

The ADA's confidentiality requirements include limited exceptions. An employer may disclose an employee’s medical condition or disability when necessary to provide reasonable accommodation; when first aid or safety personnel need to be aware of an objective potential for the need for emergency treatment; or when an employee will require assistance if there is an emergency on the job, such as a far requiring evacuation. An employer may also disclose medical information to agencies investigating the employer's compliance with the ADA and other related laws, and may disclose medical information when required for insurance claim processing.

An employer is specifically prohibited from telling coworkers that an employee has a disability or is receiving reasonable accommodation.

Contact Us

Spencer Johnson McCammon LLP
2727 Camino del Rio South
Suite 140
San Diego, CA 92108
Phone: (619) 233-1313

Spencer Johnson McCammon Weekly

Spencer Johnson McCammon Weekly

Topic of the Week

Whistleblowing - Federal Employees

Many federal employees are protected from retaliation for reporting legal violations or government waste or fraud by the government agencies they work for. Federal employee whistleblowers are protected by the Whistleblower Protection Act of 1989 (WPA) and

Read more...

Blog of the Week

Kamala Harris goes big and bold with proposal for six months of paid family leave

Sen. Kamala Harris is offering up an expansive new paid family leave proposal. Harris had previously co-sponsored the FAMILY Act, which would provide three months of paid family leave—but now she’s calling for six months. Harris’ plan also calls for families with incomes under $75,000 to get full income replacement, with higher earners getting a lower percentage, while the FAMILY Act provides up to 66%.

Thought for the Week

"Any good whistleblower law will contain two primary provisions. First, it will provide for the protection of the whistleblower’s identity.....Second, the whistleblower law should not only prohibit retaliation against the whistleblower, but also provide for specific remedies if retaliation takes place."

–Tom Spiggle

List of the Week

from Workplace Fairness

Top searches in whistleblowing this week:

  • General information about whistleblowing
  • Federal Employee whistleblowers
  • Whistleblower retaliation 
  • Food Safety whistleblowers

Top Five News Headlines

  1. Sexual Harassment Training Now Required for 20% of U.S. Workers
  2. GM CEO Barra, top UAW officials meet, injecting 'new life' into strike talks
  3. Uber and Lyft Drivers Talk About Getting Ripped Off
  4. Advocates see discrimination against older workers, the fastest-growing group in the labor force
  5. Don't start 'wage war' for workers, top executive warns, raising antitrust fears